Saturday, February 29, 2020

Canon- means a closed list of writings that are c Essays

Canon- means "a closed list of writings that are considered sacred scripture and hence authoritative." Torah- Torah (Law) Neviim-prophets Kethtuvim-writings Tanakh- previous 3 acronym Pentateuch Canonization- process of creating a canon of literature Criteria for canonization- Written before the fourth century BCE Written in Hebrew (with a few exceptions) Extent of use Use for worship/festival Biblical inerrancy- the doctrinal position that the scriptures are completely accurate and totally free of error in the original manuscripts Biblical infallibility- the belief that what the Bible says regarding matters of faith and Christian practice are wholly useful and true. Views of inspiration Mechanical Dictation Plenary Verbal Illumination Dynamic Multi-methodological Inclusivity of the text Septuagint- an ancient Greek translation of the Old Testament Textual criticism- "a methodology for deciding which wording should be followed in cases where the copies disagree" Types of variants Mistakes: misseen or misheard word; skipped a phrase; repeated a phrase etc. Intentional changes: trying to improve a text or reading Cultural changes Theological changes Sense changes Critical text- collection of all of the differences between manuscript copies of any text and the publication of all significant ones Translation- the process of translating words or text from one language into another Source language- original language which is being translated Target language- a language into which test is being translated Formal Equivalence- word for word Dynamic Equivalence- sense for sense" Historical Criticism- interpreting a text by trying to understand its original setting and audience Source Criticism- effort to discover the sources or documents behind a text behind a text and to explore how the sources were combined into larger units Form Criticism- pays particular attention to a text's genre and structure with an eye to the historical setting out of which it arose Redaction Criticism- study of how already existing textual units -narratives of incidents, laws proverbs , or other isolatable pieces (through using Source Criticism) were combined into larger texts by the activities of editors, called "redactors" Reader Response Criticism- analyzes a text by looking at the relationship between the text and its reader including the clues within the text that guide the reader in drawing meaning from it Literary Criticism- borrows literary critical approaches and applies them to the biblical text Torah- : Hebrew, "instruction" JEDP theory J (Yahwist, J from German Jahwe or Yahweh) E (Elohist from Elohim) D (Deuteronomist) P (Priestly) Primeval History- Chapters 1-11: Deals with material from the creation of the world up to the call of Abram in chapter 12 Ancestral History- Chapters 12-50: Begins with the calling of Abram to leave Ur in chapter 12 and relates the stories of the generations after Abraham Toledot- - serves to link together various parts of the text "each of which guides the reader to the major focus of the next section Genesis- derives from the greek word for "origin" or "birth," taken from the Septuagint Bereshit- 1st word in Genesis and the name of the book in the Hebrew text, means "in the beginning" or "when beginning" Exegesis- Greek "lead into" the explanation or interpretation of the meaning of a written text; Imago Dei0- (a) Mans is to be a representative of God on earth (b) man is to be a reflection of God on earth. Abraham Isaac Jacob A. Encounter between Jacob/Esau (25: 21-34; 27) B. Encounter with God and departure from home (28) C. Acquisition of wives, Leah and Rachel (29:1-30) D. Fertility: The birth of Jacob's children (29:31-30:24) D. Fertility: the growth of Jacobs's flock (30: 25-43) C.' Jacob's removal of his wives from their father's household (31: 1-32: 1) B.' Encounter with God on return home (32:22-32) A.' Reunion encounter between Jacob and Esau (33: 1-33: 17) Rebekah Israel Sarahh Binding of Isaac . Prologue (11.28-30) B. First Challenge: call for Abraham to leave family of origin (12:1-3) C. Wife-sister story (12:10-13:1) D. Separation from Lot (13:2-18) E. Covenant of pieces with Abraham (14-15) F. Hagar-Ishmael Story (16:1-14) E.' Covenant of Circumcision with Abraham D.'Hospitality/progeny episodes; Abraham contrasted with Lot (18-19) C.' Wife-sister story (20) B.' Final Challenge: Calls for Abraham to let go of Gamily of future (21:8-21; 22:1-19) A.' Epilogue 22: 20-24 Structure of Genesis 1 Sabbath Etiology- an explanation for a name, and event, a custom or ritual, or a natural phenomenon. An etiological story is one that posits a particular cause (not necessarily correctly) for something Themes in Creation Genesis Ezer Kenegdo Adam/Adamah Boundary Corruption Progressive Corruption Anthropomorphic Cain Abel Seth Covenant Noachide Covenant Themes in Gen. 1-11 Abrahamic Covenant 1. I will make you a great nation (v 2) 2. I will bless you and make your name great (v. 2) 3. Bless those who bless you, curse those who curse you (v. 3) 4. In you all of the families of the earth

Thursday, February 13, 2020

A Life-Span View Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

A Life-Span View - Assignment Example It is evidently clear from the discussion that the researcher’s life dates back when she was a little girl. She was a jovial and playful baby. The people around me were truthful which led to the elemental sense of my trustworthiness. The researcher depended on her mother and her father for care, comfort, and sustenance. By this time, the author’s relative comprehension of the world came from her parents, particularly her mother, and their interactions with her. The researcher’s parents’ regularity, warmth, and reliable fondness exposed her to a world ruled by the trust. There was no point in the author’s life that her parents failed to offer a secure surrounding to meet her basic need. Just like noted under Erikson’s Psychosocial Theory, this would have created mistrust which would have resulted in suspicions, lack of confidence, withdrawal and frustration to me. The researcher’s parents were the regular sources of comfort, food, love, which taught her to trust. As the author grew older, she started to choose clothes by herself. By the age of 3, the author had gained control over eliminative roles and would make choices in her life and explored the environment around her. Needless to say, her parents still provided a secure environment where the author would carry out her own activities at will. The researcher’s patients were patient and would wait to look at her choices and would correct her if I had gone wrong at some point. At this time of the researcher’s life, she had developed a strong interest in music and played with the radio. The author would put some loud music which her parents would control by informing her to reduce the high volume. The author was able to feed herself now and would wash her clothes and use the bathroom on her own. Between the age of 3 and 6 years, the author was imaging much. She would take on tasks just because she had been active. The researcher was slowly learning t he world around her and learning numerous basic principles. The researcher would tie her shoes and tie her school tie and would speak effectively with her parents without any problems. The author did not like being idle and would felt guilty if it happened. The author felt the urge to help her mother with her household chores. The author would also feel bad if she did something and was not productive as she had anticipated.

Saturday, February 1, 2020

The immigration debate Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

The immigration debate - Essay Example In other words, the undocumented workers may take jobs away from Americans, but these are jobs Americans did not want in the first place. Rather, the illegal immigrants are doing us a favor by accomplishing the tasks that Americans find to menial for their tastes. In the overall scheme of things, illegal immigrants actually provide a larger benefit to the American economic system by adding at least $10 billion a year to our GDP. A small contribution to an overall GDP of a $10 trillion economy but an increase none the less and in our current national economic state, every little bit helps to ease the burden of inflation on the public. By boosting our GDP, these workers have actually proven that a larger workforce, regardless of employment status, will actually make a difference when it comes to worker output and/or consumer spending ( Said, Carolyn â€Å"The Immigration Debate†). Instead, the illegal immigrants who are working for us should be considered unsung heroes who actually contribute to the system. the Social Security system to be precise . The only problem is that since this batch of employees do not use valid SS numbers, their contributions remain floating within our system. So rather than debating the effects of illegal immigration on the workforce or economy, what we should really be looking at is a way to help make the contribution of these workers a part of the economic system of the country since those contributions are currently located in an economic limbo where it remains useless to everyone